Corrections

How we correct

• If an article states a fact that is wrong, we fix the text and change the "Updated" date at the top. The article also gets a dated note in its History list, next to the dates.
• If the mistake changed what you should do, the article also says so in the text, at the place where the mistake was.
• Entries in the platform change log are never rewritten. We add a correction under the entry, with its own date, and leave the original text as it was.
• Typos and clearer wording do not get a note. Every change, small or large, is kept in the site's version history (where the record lives).
• Found a mistake? Tell us in #question-thread on our Discord. Operators who hit a problem first are usually the first to notice.

Articles and guides

1. 21 October 2026AI OFM tools: the full stack, job by jobAffiliate links

   Updated the Higgsfield source. Its plan cards now give Starter as 135 Nano Banana Pro generations a month, the same as the plan comparison, instead of 100.

2. 21 October 2026Best AI video model for an AI influencer: what holds a face

   Updated. Google is shutting down the Veo 3.1 preview models in the Gemini API on 22 October 2026. Google's direct route to Veo 3.1 Fast is now its Agent Platform on Google Cloud, at the same $0.10 per second at 720p with sound. Higgsfield's plan cards now give Starter as 135 Nano Banana Pro generations, the same as its plan comparison; the 100 on the cards is gone.

3. 21 October 2026Kling motion control for an AI persona: face, cost, rules

   Updated for the Kling 4.0 launch. Kling 4.0 has been live in the Kling app since 15 October 2026, so the article no longer calls it upcoming. The dedicated motion control tool, its credit prices and the API prices are still Kling 3.0, and Kling's API plans do not support 4.0 yet.

4. 21 October 2026Kling motion control for an AI persona: face, cost, rules

   Later the same day Kling's API opened Kling 4.0 in early access and published its price per second. The article no longer says the API does not offer 4.0. It now gives the 4.0 price for a clip with a motion video. The motion control tool and every price in the tables are still Kling 3.0.

5. 5 October 2026AI character consistency: hosted tools or your own LoRA

   Added. The advice to start on a hosted tool and train a LoRA later now says that Higgsfield's Terms of Use (sections 5.1(iii) and 5.2(iv)) forbid training a model on its outputs, so a later LoRA dataset cannot come from Higgsfield images.

6. 5 October 2026AI influencer workflow: a realistic weekAffiliate links

   Corrected. An earlier version said Fanvue allows much more inbox automation than the guide recommends and that you do not have to hide fully automated replies from the platform. Fanvue's General Terms forbid accounts "controlled by other automated means", and Fanvue does not say where a reply bot crosses that line. The section now says so.

7. 5 October 2026AI OFM tools: the full stack, job by jobAffiliate links

   Corrected the video prices. The $0.10 per clip for MiniMax H3 was a 50% promotion; the list price for a 5-second clip is $0.20. The $0.81 for Seedance 2.5 was its cheapest setting; a default 5-second clip lists at $1.80. The MiniMax H3 LoRA line now says that it only takes LoRAs trained for H3.

8. 5 October 2026Best AI video model for an AI influencer: what holds a face

   Corrected. Video prices are now list prices for a 5-second clip at default settings. The $0.81 for Seedance 2.5 was its cheapest setting (480p); a default 720p clip lists at $1.80. The $0.10 for MiniMax H3 was a 50% promotion; the list price is $0.20. An earlier version also said your existing character LoRA works in MiniMax H3. It only takes a LoRA trained for H3, and WaveSpeed has no H3 trainer.

9. 5 October 2026Best platform for an AI influencer? We use FanvueAffiliate links

   Changed. An earlier version compared Fanvue with “everywhere else in this category” and said that no other platform had a comparable published position on AI creators. This guide no longer compares subscription platforms. The table now shows Fanvue’s own rules, and the page says only what we can show: Fanvue publishes a written rule that allows AI creator accounts, and it is the platform we use and recommend.

10. 5 October 2026Does TikTok allow AI influencers? What the label requires

    Updated to TikTok's own pages. The article now quotes the Community Guidelines released on 25 August 2026 (in force since 24 September 2026) and TikTok's help page on AI-generated content, instead of only news reports. The label rule is the same. New: what is not allowed even with a label, and that TikTok says the label does not change how widely a video is shown.

11. 5 October 2026Fanvue AI chatbot rules: what you can automateAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said nothing in Fanvue's documents speaks against fully automated replies, and that Fanvue does not appear to have a problem with them. Fanvue's General Terms forbid "bot" accounts and accounts "controlled by other automated means", while its API docs show an auto-reply chatbot and its API policy allows sending messages. The page now quotes both and says that Fanvue does not explain where the line is. The API tutorial also mentions an optional human review step, which an earlier version said it did not.

12. 5 October 2026Instagram's AI-generated profile label: what to do now

    Corrected. An earlier version called the label on a single post a "made with AI" tag. Instagram now calls it "AI content", and the toggle you set is "Add AI label". The page now quotes Instagram's help centre.

13. 5 October 2026Is Fanvue legit? What it is, what it pays, what to checkAffiliate links

    Changed. An earlier version said that, of the platforms we checked, Fanvue is the one with a clear published rule that allows AI creator accounts. We no longer compare platforms. The article now says only what we can show: Fanvue publishes a written rule that allows AI creator accounts.

14. 5 October 2026What is AI OFM? AI OnlyFans Management, explainedAffiliate links

    Changed. An earlier version said that most operators use Fanvue, and that among the platforms we checked, Fanvue is the one with a clear public rule that allows AI creators. There is no count of operators behind “most”, and we no longer compare platforms. The article now says many operators use Fanvue, and that it publishes a rule that allows AI creators.

15. 4 October 2026Are AI influencers legal? US, EU, UK and IndiaAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said OnlyFans has no published AI policy. Its terms ask for an #ai caption on AI content. The sentence now only cites what its leadership said in public.

16. 4 October 2026Best platform for an AI influencer? We use FanvueAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said Fanvue is the only platform that publishes a written position on AI creators, that OnlyFans has no published policy, and that most AI persona income is earned on Fanvue. OnlyFans’ terms ask for an #ai caption on AI content, and there is no source for the income claim. Both are corrected.

17. 4 October 2026C2PA metadata stripped? How to check and why to keep it

    Added that for small and medium-sized businesses, including one-person businesses, the lower of the two AI Act fine limits applies (Article 99(6)).

18. 4 October 2026EU AI Act Article 50: is your AI persona a deepfake?

    Added that for small and medium-sized businesses, including one-person businesses, the lower of the two AI Act fine limits applies (Article 99(6)).

19. 4 October 2026EU AI Act Article 50: is your AI persona a deepfake?

    Corrected the description of § 184b StGB: it covers sexual depictions of children, including realistic AI-generated ones. The rule on this site is unchanged: nothing that looks under 18, sexual or not.

20. 4 October 2026EU AI Act compliance for AI persona operators

    Added that for small and medium-sized businesses, including one-person businesses, the lower of the two AI Act fine limits applies (Article 99(6)).

21. 4 October 2026EU AI Act compliance for AI persona operators

    Corrected the description of § 184b StGB: it covers sexual depictions of children, including realistic AI-generated ones. The rule on this site is unchanged: nothing that looks under 18, sexual or not.

22. 4 October 2026EU AI Act compliance for AI persona operators

    Corrected. Removed a sentence that said Fanvue forbids pretending that a live human is talking. We could not find that rule in Fanvue’s published policies.

23. 4 October 2026Fanvue payout terms: the 8 numbers that matterAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said most AI persona income is earned on Fanvue. There is no source for that. It now says Fanvue is the platform we use, and that it has a published rule that allows AI creators.

24. 4 October 2026Fanvue vs OnlyFans for an AI personaAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said OnlyFans has no published AI policy. Its Terms of Service ask for AI-generated content to be captioned with a tag such as #ai. The page now quotes that rule. The statements by its CEO and an investor about fully AI accounts are unchanged.

25. 4 October 2026How much do AI influencers make? What Fanvue's data saysAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said most AI persona income is earned on Fanvue. There is no source for that. It now says Fanvue is the platform we use, and that it has a published rule that allows AI creators.

26. 4 October 2026How to make an AI influencer: the decisions, in orderAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said most AI persona income is earned on Fanvue. There is no source for that. It now says Fanvue is the platform we use, and that it has a published rule that allows AI creators.

27. 4 October 2026Is AI OFM legit? The business, and the pitchAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said most AI persona income is earned on Fanvue. There is no source for that. It now says Fanvue is the platform we use, and that it has a published rule that allows AI creators. The source box on the EU labelling rule now names Article 50(4), the article it quotes.

28. 4 October 2026Is Fanvue legit? What it is, what it pays, what to checkAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said Fanvue is the platform in this niche that officially allows AI creators, and that most AI persona income is earned there. It now says that, of the platforms we checked, it is the one with a clear published rule. The funding round is no longer presented as proof that creators are paid.

29. 4 October 2026Risk for AI persona accounts: bans, terms and recovery

    Corrected the description of § 184b StGB: it covers sexual depictions of children, including realistic AI-generated ones. The rule on this site is unchanged: nothing that looks under 18, sexual or not.

30. 4 October 2026What is AI OFM? AI OnlyFans Management, explainedAffiliate links

    Corrected. An earlier version said most AI persona income is earned on Fanvue. There is no source for that. It now says Fanvue is the platform we use, and that it has a published rule that allows AI creators.

31. 1 October 2026C2PA metadata stripped? How to check and why to keep it

    Corrected. An earlier version said the EU AI Act forbids you to remove C2PA markers and watermarks. It does not: the Act puts the marking duty on the tool maker. New title, summary, FAQ answers and source boxes. The advice to keep the markers stays, because platforms read them and tool terms may forbid removing them.

Platform change log

1. 1 October 2026Article 50 transparency obligations started applying

   The last sentence above was wrong. Article 50 does not say that you must not remove the machine-readable markers. Article 50(2) makes the providers of AI generators mark their output. It sets no rule for deployers about those markers. The only ban on removing them on purpose is in the voluntary Code of Practice on AI-generated content, as a clause that signatory providers put into their terms. Keep the markers anyway: platforms read them to label your posts automatically.

2. 29 September 2026The AI Act’s prohibitions and AI literacy requirement started applying

   The last sentence above was wrong. The bans on AI that generates non-consensual sexual and intimate content or child sexual abuse material were not split off from the 2025 list. They are a new provision. The Digital Omnibus, which the Council adopted on 29 June 2026, added them to the Act. They apply from 2 December 2026. See that entry: its source is the Council’s own press release and not a third-party timeline.

3. 8 September 2026The "AI creator" label became "AI-generated profile"

   The reach claim above was too broad. Meta’s own wording is narrower: accounts it believes are AI-generated profiles and have not labelled themselves "may see limits to their account’s reach by becoming ineligible to appear in recommendations until they add the profile label". So the account is taken out of recommendations completely. It is not just shown a little less. This only affects accounts Meta has identified. Meta tells you first, and you can appeal in Account Status. Meta also says that using the label "will neither help nor hurt your account’s reach". One more point: the post label is required only for photorealistic video or realistic audio. Meta does not ask you to label AI-generated images. So if your persona posts only still images, the account label is the one you need.